The Transcontinental Railroad was a Massive Government Spending Project
July 1st, 1862 the U.S. Congress enacted the Pacific Railroad Act with the signature of President Abraham Lincoln’s pen. In a move of extreme, left-wing, liberal politics the Transcontinental Railroad would be built largely at federal government expense. Two railroad companies (i.e. Union Pacific and Central Pacific) were given by the U.S. government as much as 6,400 acres of land and $48,000 in government bonds for every mile of track they built from Omaha, NE to Sacramento, CA.
At the time, the Civil War was generating massive government expenditures for troops and war material. President Abraham Lincoln and the United States Congress still decided to expand government by signing immense spending proposals into law. In an effort to build telegraph and railroad lines from the Atlantic to the Pacific, the U.S. government spent large sums of money in what might be considered an historical starting point for modern U.S. prosperity. Congress had already been spending money on topographical surveys for the best train route as early as the 1850’s but by 1863 the money spent by the U.S. federal government increased dramatically.
The Union Pacific took more than 8,000 immigrants into its workforce from Ireland, Germany and Italy. In contrast, the Central Pacific’s crews eventually teamed with more than 10,000 Chinese immigrants. The last spike for the Transcontinental Railroad was driven home May 10, 1869 at Promontory, UT. The legacy of the Pacific Railroad Act is multifaceted but it ultimately allowed for quicker transportation of goods as well as communication of ideas across the United States. This act of Congress, and President Lincoln, also exposed how U.S. corporations embroil and entangle the nation in pertinent social issues which have not been fully addressed to this day.
Chinese laborers were used by Central Pacific Railroad for a variety of reasons, but among the most cited include the Chinese laborer's character of dependability and sobriety. It’s also telling that Chinese immigrants would work 12-hour days, 6 days a week for $26 to $35 a month, without company provided food or shelter compared to $35 a month with food and shelter required by white American laborers. The Central Pacific in turn picked up a dependable worker in the men from China while driving down salaries for blasting, digging and taming the Sierra Nevada Mountains for travel. Politicians across the land were found to have their hands dirty from the scandal which was called the Credit Mobilier Scandal. Although a public investigation took place in 1873, punishment for fraudulent activites was generally lenient, in some cases amounting to only public censure. Taking this snapshot of American history and applying it to today. Republicans are being dishonest about cutting all government spending. They don’t really want to cut military spending. Military spending is very similar to the government spending which enriched a few people while employing many during the time of the first Transcontinental Railroad. We no longer have a continent to cross so we make war with others instead as economic activity. While we make war, politicians—and former politicians—prosper along with their close friends (e.g. Dick Cheney and Haliburton.) Republican dishonesty accounts for a hypocritical message today which says, ‘government spending’ is a waste; when really, government spending is one of the few ways economic booms ever take place in the U.S.
Another part of the Pacific Railroad Act of 1862’s legacy was how it established the wealth and careers of several men in the United States. Collis P. Huntington, with the direct assistance of then California Governor Leland Stanford, cemented his fortunes when he “saw the value in the land grants and loans given the partners by Congress.”
Although he didn’t drive railroad spikes home, he obtained massive wealth by lobbying Congress and networking with investors. James Harvey Strobridge, who served as foremen on the railroad lines, was more actively involved in managing the day to day construction but never acquired anything near the opulent wealth put on display from 1919 until today by Collis P. Huntington’s nephew at the Huntington Library in San Marino, CA.
Central Pacific Railroad workers were lucky if they could buy a small farm when their job was finished. Foremen James Harvey Strobridge, half blind from an accident incurred while building the 1st Transcontinental Railroad, sought wealth building a second railroad after dedicating years of commitment to building the first. The story of America seems to be a guy providing funds with little sweat earns millions then (and billions now) while the worker bee must be satisfied with the possibility of an opportunity to one day become filthy rich.
Much of the money made from and by the construction of the Transcontinental Railroad originated from federal handouts from Congress. Whether we consider profits earned by owners (i.e. Huntington, Stanford, Mark Hopkins or Charles Crocker) or wages earned by immigrant workers the source of the money was largely U.S. federal investment of taxpayer dollars. In this way, government spending inspired private citizens to create jobs in hopes of attaining massive amounts of land and money. (The term private enterprise is used loosely since so much of the enterprise depended on government spending and incentives)
At the other end of the tracks, the Union Pacific Railroad demonstrated other aspects of how “private” enterprise functions in American history. Dr. Thomas Clark Durant took on the challenge of gaining federal loans in order to build the railroad from east to west meeting the Central Pacific Railroad in the middle. In the process, Durant formed a corporation called Credit Mobilier to handle federal loan money thereby enriching the corporate shareholders. Congressional representatives bought shares of the company’s stock to get in on the act. Eventually, Credit Mobilier was accused of fraudulently obtaining $50 million more than needed for railroad construction.
One problem now is government spending has been dedicated to people and corporations who are no longer employing (i.e. benefitting) the public, even when we consider they always will pay for only a fraction of what the labor is worth.



This is very refreshing in the way it simplifies and breaks down the very thing that moves the economy and makes the fat cats rich. It has it all, greed, imigration, cheap labor. Good article!
Reply to this
Thank you very much. I'm glad you enjoyed it.
Reply to this
The Transcontinental Railroad (aka the "Pacific Railroad") actually did not cost the Government anything and in fact saved it vast sums of money. The US Government Pacific Railroad Bonds were all repaid to the Government (with interest) by the CPRR and UPRR, while the railroads were granted 6,400 acres per mile the government also retained 6,400 which it sold off to settlers who were only able to do so because of access to transportation provided by the railroad, it cut the time needed for coast to coast travel from as much as six months to less than a week, saved the Government huge sums in transportation costs for the military and the mails, and enabled the country to bcome a giant in international commerce. The railroads were also completed more then seven years ahead of schedule (the Pacific Railroad Act of 1862 set a completion date of July 4, 1876) and under budget.
Reply to this
Your input on this subject is greatly appreciated. I'll be the first to say I didn't know all of that. I believe in this case the money initially spent by the government to get the railroads built was money well spent. Without government spending, it may have taken much longer to get the railroad built (if it was ever built at all.) Thank you for your contribution.
Reply to this
People sure no how to take things out of context and create controversy. Open your eyes and stop being so narrow minded.
Reply to this
Oh! I didn't realize how misguided I was until your entirely overgeneral message opened my eyes to the truth. What is it I'm supposed to believe now?
Reply to this